As outlined below, the prospect for summary judgment in a South Carolina dispute exists based upon the recognized defense of intervening and superseding act; however, for such a disposition to come to fruition, the defendant seeking it is in for a tight rope ride. The key difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause is foreseeability. Thus, notwithstanding Hancock’s “scintilla of the evidence” standard, the trial court’s discretion to engage in a critical analysis of the facts, as articulated in Bass, Bloom, and Small remains good law in South Carolina. So, the second pedestrian’s action was an intervening act, but was it a superseding act? If the employee is acting unreasonably when the event occurred, the event will be deemed an independent cause of disability and the employee can be denied benefits. Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of “superseding” versus “intervening”. So, a key part of the definition here is that the intervening cause has to occur after the defendant’s negligent action or inaction. Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. 1986) (“Only in rare or exceptional cases may the question of proximate cause be decided as a matter of law.”). Thus, for an intervening act to be a superseding cause that relieves an actor from liability, the intervening act must be a cause that could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated. As well, the adroit use of discovery devices from the inception of the case such as well-drafted requests to admit and carefully crafted deposition questions built to engender admissions from the plaintiff and material witnesses, which support the conclusion that the evidence is susceptible to only one inference, is mission critical too. 1995) (holding that for intervening act to break causal link, intervening act must be unforeseeable). In other words, a superseding cause is an intervening act that is legally sufficient to transfer blame for the harm in question from the defendant to a third party, or to a natural event. Please reference the Terms of Use and the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your state. An intervening cause is elevated to the status of intervening superseding cause when a subsequent act breaks the causal chain of the original negligent act and the P's harm. All Rights Reserved. 1997) (citing Young v. Tide Craft, Inc., 270 S.C. 453, 242 S.E.2d 671 (1978); see also Bramlette v. Charter–Medical–Columbia, 302 S.C. 68, 393 S.E.2d 914 (1990) (ruling primary wrongdoer’s action is legal cause of injury if either intervening act or injury itself was foreseeable as natural and probable consequence of that action); Stone v. Bethea, 251 S.C. 157, 161–62, 161 S.E.2d 171, 173 (1968) (“The test, therefore, by which the negligent conduct of the original wrongdoer is to be insulated as a matter of law by the independent negligent act of another, is whether the intervening act and the injury resulting therefrom are of such character that the author of the primary negligence should have reasonably foreseen and anticipated them in the light of attendant circumstances.”). Although the courts are divided on this question,8 they often hold that a negligent intervening A superseding cause means that a third party’s actions intervene and cause the accident. The court must determine whether the employee was acting unreasonably when the event occurred. A superseding or intervening act is one that is the immediate and sole cause of the injury or harm. In contrast to an intervening cause, which does not relieve the original defendant of liability, a superseding cause usually does relieve the original defendant of liability. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Small v. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 329 S.C. 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d 835, 844 (Ct. App. 2009), aff’d, 395 S.C. 129, 716 S.E.2d 910 (2011) (affirming the Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment, which included the conclusion that, as a matter of law, the defendant’s negligence exceeded any negligence on the part of the defendants); see also Bloom v. Ravoira, 339 S.C. 417, 422, 529 S.E.2d 710, 713 (2000) (holding If the sole reasonable inference that may be drawn from the evidence is that the plaintiff’s negligence exceeded fifty percent, the circuit court may determine judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant); Small v. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 329 S.C. 448, 464, 494 S.E.2d 835, 843 (Ct. App. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. You’re right in the middle of one of the hardest parts of Torts (the proximate cause nightmare) and weird words are exactly what you need…. As the Supreme Court of Georgia pointed out, the effect of intervening or superseding causes depends upon whether the act of a third party will render the earlier act too remote to maintain the liability of the defendant. This hurdle got that much higher with the Supreme Court’s decision in Hancock v. Mid–South Management Company, Inc., 381 S.C. 326, 330, 673 S.E.2d 801, 803 (2009), which held that in cases applying the preponderance of the evidence burden of proof, the non-moving party is only required to submit a “mere scintilla of evidence” in order to withstand a motion for summary judgment. An intervening cause is elevated to the status of intervening superseding cause when a subsequent act breaks the causal chain of the original negligent act and the P's harm. Id. An independent intervening cause is an act or event (by a party other than the defendant) that happens after the negligent act and injures the plaintiff. Do Not Sell My Personal Information. In a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages. superseding cause n. the same as an "intervening cause," or "supervening cause," which is an event which occurs after the initial act leading to an accident, and substantially causes the accident. The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. 3. INTERVENING NEGLIGENCE and difficult when that act is a negligent one.7 The question then becomes: Should the intervening negligence of X be regarded as a "superseding cause," relieving D of liability? Put all these together and a defendant pursuing such an outcome has a fighting chance. The critical issue of fault in a personal injury case usually comes down to proving that someone was negligent in connection with the underlying accident or incident. Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of “superseding” versus “intervening”. If the original negligence continues to the time of the injury and contributes substantially thereto in conjunction with the intervening act, each may be a proximate, concurring cause for which full liability may be imposed. 1988); see also Dixon v. Besco Eng’g, Inc., 320 S.C. 174, 463 S.E.2d 636 (Ct. App. Superseding Cause. ... A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, … Even where a defendant’s conduct may be a source of negligence, the negligence may not be the proximate cause of the claimed injury. A superseding or intervening act is one that breaks the chain of causation linking a defendant s wrongful act and an injury or harm suffered by a plaintiff. Arguably, the lack of foreseeably analysis becomes easier for the moving party when the intervening and superseding act in question is of an intentional and/or criminal nature. In a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages. Those taken by third parties those taken by the claimant themselves, and those which are acts of nature. Fraternity, 291 S.C. 140, 147, 352 S.E.2d 488, 493 (Ct. App. 1997) (“The particular facts and circumstances of each case determine whether the question of proximate cause should be decided by the court or by the jury. Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. The independent intervening cause in this case was due to the Carpenter’s own conduct in refusing to take his medication in accordance with his doctor’s instructions. Stone,251 S.C.at, 162, 161 S.E.2d at 173–74 (1968) (citation omitted). Intervening cause — An intervening cause is a potential defense to the tort of negligence, if it is an unforeseeable, and therefore superseding intervening cause, rather than a foreseeable intervening cause.For example, if a defendant had carelessly spilled gasoline … Wikipedia The California Supreme Court recently has considered the superseding intervening cause cases, as one eminent scholar in the field of torts has declared courts should do, fn. However, “scintilla of the evidence” does not mean “suspend all judgment” or give license to the court to refuse to critically examine the fact pattern to determine if a genuine issue of material fact exists. The attorney listings on this site are paid attorney advertising. Results achieved on behalf of clients do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients. The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. Application of Intervening and Superseding Act in Negligence Cases as a Basis for Summary Judgment December 11, 2019 by Christian Stegmaier Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. Website by. Defenses against Negligence A. Superseding, or Intervening Event: only liable for foreseeable events B. Oliver v. South Carolina Dep’t of Hwys. causing the injury. Application of Intervening and Superseding Act in Negligence Cases as a Basis for Summary Judgment By Christian Stegmaier Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. The question which naturally arises is whether the determination of superseding cause in this context is a … the negligence of the defendant was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's [injury] [damage]. In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. If you leave an open hole in a sidewalk, it's reasonable to foresee someone falling into it, especially if the sidewalk is crowded. Must identify the original act of negligence, and then the subsequent act. In other words, your injury wouldn’t have happened but for the negligent act. A superseding cause disrupts the causal chain because the link between the defendant’s conduct and … An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause. Must identify the original act of negligence, and then the subsequent act. Stegmaier welcomes your questions at (803) 255-0454 or cstegmaier@collinsandlacy.com. Let’s look at an example of this. Not all intervening acts are superseding causes. Start studying Negligence: intervening superseding cause. Hurd v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 (2005); Rush v. Blanchard, 310 S.C. 375, 426 S.E.2d 802 (1993). Legal cause is proved by establishing foreseeability. Whether an intervening act breaks the causal connection between the original alleged tortious act and subsequent injury is a typically question for the fact finder and this determination will not be disturbed on appeal unless found to be without evidence which reasonably supports finding. This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. In a negligence action, the … Cowan, supra, 111 N.J.at 465. In a superseding intervening cause action, just as in a regular negligence action, there are two parts to determining legal cause. He is also active in the firm’s professional liability and appellate practices. superseding cause — An act of a third person or other force which by its intervention prevents the actor from being liable for harm to another which his antecedent negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about. ‘Concurrent negligence consists of the negligence of two or more This is because our courts have held generally that when, between original negligence and the occurrence of an injury, there intervenes a willful, malicious, and criminal act of a third person producing the injury, but that such was not intended by the negligent person and could not have been foreseen by him, the causal chain between the negligence and the accident is broken. Copyright © 2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states. The independent intervening cause in this case was due to the Carpenter’s own conduct in refusing to take his medication in accordance with his doctor’s instructions. There are three varieties of intervening acts. An intervening act, which is a normal response created by negligence, is not a superseding, intervening cause so as to relieve the original wrongdoer of liability, provided the intervening act could have reasonably been foreseen and the conduct was a substantial factor in … In some jurisdictions, an intervening cause that removes liability is called a superseding cause. An intervening cause can be the action of another person (who is generally called a "third party"), and it can also be an act of nature, such as a branch falling from a tree or a weather-related event. A superseding cause sufficient to become the proximate cause of the final result and relieve defendant of liability for his original negligence, arises only when an intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with … See Ballou v. Sigma Nu Gen. “An intervening act will be deemed a superseding cause and will serve to relieve defendant of liability when the act is of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuates defendants negligence from the ultimate injury that responsibility for the injury may … Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 296 S.C. 219, 371 S.E.2d 539 (Ct. App. In other words, an unforeseeable or improbable intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause, and will allow a defendant to escape liability. Sign up to receive our e-mail newsletters straight to your inbox! at 316, 422 S.E.2d at 130. Professors throw these terms around as if they are household words. Some seemingly independent events are actually foreseeable consequences of … Sometimes this is called supervening cause or superseding. 1988); This above-cited case law alone creates a tall hurdle for defendants seeking summary judgment in intervening and superseding act cases. In contrast to an intervening cause, which does not relieve the original defendant of liability, a superseding cause usually does relieve the original defendant of liability. In a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages. Sparks from the fire cause Petrol's truck to explode, sending the fire on the way to Rancher's barns and home, which burn down. • “Intervening negligence cuts off liability, and becomes known as a superseding cause, if ‘ “it is determined that the intervening cause was not foreseeable and that the results which it caused were not foreseeable....” ’ ” (Martinez, supra, A superseding cause means that a third party’s actions intervene and cause the accident. Is there a prospect for summary judgment or is the defendant absolutely forced to submit the case to a trial jury? Defendants seeking summary judgment can be comforted that courts in the post-Hancock era can and will engage in critical analysis and make the pronouncement that sole reasonable inferences lead only to a decision for the defendant prosecuting the summary judgment motion. An intervening cause is an event that occurs after the defendant’s negligence that contributes to the plaintiff’s harm. See, e.g., Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 (Ct. App. ‘Concurrent negligence consists of the negligence of two or more Id. Hurd, 363 S.C. at 428, 611 S.E.2d at 492. Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. This is the biggest difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause. The bus passenger who got hit sues the bus company for failing to provide a safe place for passengers to disembark. Intervening Acts (Or Novus Actus Interveniens) It is also possible for certain events to break the chain of causation between the defendant’s actions and the claimant’s injuries. superseding cause n. the same as an "intervening cause" or "supervening cause," which is an event which occurs after the initial act leading to an accident and substantially causes the accident. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. “Thus, if an injury is produced by an intervening and superseding cause, even though the original negligence may have been a substantial factor in bringing about the injury, the original actor is not legally responsible therefore because the necessary proximate cause is … Additionally, getting the motion in front of a presiding trial judge with a reputation to being even-keeled and open to grant summary judgment when the circumstances warrant is also a fundamental requirement. It can be achieved, but it’s a challenge. This website is for informational purposes only. Thus, to answer the legendary question posed by Lloyd Christmas from Dumb and Dumber, “So, you’re telling me there’s a chance?” for summary judgment, the answer is “Yes.”  With that said, the stars must very much align to put a defendant in a position to obtain a summary judgment order, holding the intervening and superseding act (or acts) operate to preclude recovery by the plaintiff as a matter of law. Copyright © 2020 Collins & Lacy, P.C. A favorable set of facts—when viewed objectively and honestly–is key. • “[A]n intervening act does not amount to a ‘superseding cause’ relieving the negligent defendant of liability if it was reasonably foreseeable: ‘[An] actor may be liable if his negligence is a substantial factor in causing an injury, and he is The second pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff into the hole. But in this situation, the actions of the car driver may be considered a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries, whether or not the bus company could also be considered negligent. Intervening Cause and Superseding Cause Superseding cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. Superseding cause is when an independent event occurred during an accident that keeps the negligent party (the defendant) safe from liability. This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. 1 NOTE WELL: Insulating negligence, also referred to in North Carolina case law as intervening or superseding negligence, Barber v. Constien, 130 N.C. App. III. It is always for the jury, except when the facts are such that they will support only one reasonable inference.”) (footnote and emphasis in original omitted). Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. An independent intervening cause can be reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence. Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, … When making determinations regarding whether proximate cause exists, parties will want to consider whether a superseding or intervening cause for a claimant’s injury is a defense to claims. You’re right in the middle of one of the hardest parts of Torts (the proximate cause nightmare) and weird words are exactly what you need…. Transp., 309 S.C. 313, 422 S.E.2d 128 (1992). If the original negligence continues to the time of the injury and contributes substantially thereto in conjunction with the intervening act, each may be a proximate, concurring cause for which full liability may be imposed. An injury is foreseeable if it is the natural and probable consequence of a breach of duty. Proximate cause requires proof of both causation in fact and legal cause. 380, 383, 502 … A fellow pedestrian negligently fails to leave enough room for the plaintiff to pass on the sidewalk, and the plaintiff falls into the hole. labelling superseding cause as "an act of a third person or other force which by its intervention prevents the actor from being liable for harm to another which his antecedent negligence is a. substantial factor in Donegan v. • “ [A]n intervening act does not amount to a ‘superseding cause’ relieving the negligent defendant of liability if it was reasonably foreseeable: ‘ [An] actor may be liable if his negligence is a substantial factor in causing an injury, and he is not relieved of liability because of the intervening act of a … So, what is the recipe for success for a defendant seeking summary judgment in an intervening and superseding act case? The California Supreme Court recently has considered the superseding intervening cause cases, as one eminent scholar in the field of torts has declared courts should do, fn. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. Other jurisdictions do not use the term superseding cause. Under longstanding premises liability standards, the homeowner is almost certainly negligent for leaving an open hole in the sidewalk. The original defendant will usually still be considered at least partially liable for the plaintiff’s injury even when an intervening cause is said to exist. [5] intervening negligence of the physician must be disconnected from the negligence of the hospital and must be of itself an efficient, independent and self-producing cause of the patient's injury. Causation in fact is proved by establishing the plaintiff’s injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s negligence. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. Filed Under: Blog, Legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality Law Blog, Spotlight Tagged With: Christian Stegmaier, retail & hospitality. (Get the basics on negligence in a personal injury case.). If, after the defendant acts negligently toward the plaintiff, a new cause combines with the defendant’s negligence to contribute to or worsen the plaintiff’s injury, that new cause is sometimes called an "intervening cause." Learn more about proving fault in a personal injury case. Christian Stegmaier is a shareholder and chair of the Retail & Hospitality Practice Group at Collins & Lacy in Columbia. causing the injury. In other words, an unforeseeable or improbable intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause, and will allow a defendant to escape liability. The defense of superseding intervening cause is a defense that uses negligence principles. Application of Intervening and Superseding Act in Negligence Cases as a Basis for Summary Judgment By Christian Stegmaier Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. Model Jury Charge (Civil) 6.14; see alsoDavis v. Hurd v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 (2005); Rush v. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. Professors throw these terms around as if they are household words. Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. The answer is probably no because the intervening action was (or should have been) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner. Petrol's negligence is an intervening cause which gets Flameout off the liability hook. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. An intervening act will be called a superseding cause (or act) that relieves the original defendant of liability when the intervening act was or should have been reasonably foreseeable to the original defendant. A negligence claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant’s negligence. “An intervening act will be deemed a superseding cause and will serve to relieve defendant of liability when the act is of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuates defendants negligence from the ultimate injury that responsibility for the injury may not be reasonably attributed to the defendant (see, e.g., Martinez v. An intervening cause may break the connection between the injury and the defendant’s action, and thus destroy a negligence claim. In tort law, an intervening cause is an event that occurs after a tortfeasor's initial act of negligence and causes injury/harm to a victim. It must be truly independent and not set in motion by the defendant’s negligence. Meanwhile, the driver of a nearby car puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the bus. Hurd v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 (2005); Rush v. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. Voting Absentee in South Carolina in the 2020 Election, Announcing THE LEGAL BENCH, Our New Podcast, South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission to Reactivate Fines for Reports and Forms on May 1, 2020. Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, 296 S.C. at 229, 371 S.E.2d at 545 (Ct. App. A defendant's superseding intervening cause argument was characterized by that court as "nothing more than an improper attempt to inject comparative negligence principles into this strict product liability action." If the intervening cause is foreseeable, however, the defendant will still be liable. Only when the evidence is susceptible to only one inference does it become a matter of law for the court.”) (citations omitted); Leon Green, Rationale of Proximate Cause 132 (1927) (“Causal relation is one of fact. But what happens when an intervening and superseding act occurs between the original act of alleged negligence and injury, which calls into question whether the original alleged tortfeasor is liable for the plaintiff’s purported damages? The first part of the analysis is the cause-in-fact analysis, which is a determination of whether the defendant’s actions were a “cause-in-fact” of the injuries. In other words, in a personal injury lawsuit filed by the injured passenger against the bus company, the company will point to the car driver's negligence as a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries. An independent intervening cause can be reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence. It has been held a third party’s intervening acts of wrongdoing do not break the causal chain if the acts were foreseeable. Let’s say a person is getting off a bus in a parking lot. & Pub. Let’s say that a homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians. And as part of establishing the negligence, the injured person must show that the at-fault party's action (or inaction) was a cause (sometimes called a "proximate" cause in legalese) of the resulting injuries. ( or should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages,..., 611 S.E.2d at 545 ( Ct. App intervening event: only liable for foreseeable events B was an and... Trial jury over the person who just got off the bus company for failing to provide a safe place passengers... To your state the victim 's injury only if the intervening cause, ” may be proven have. 488 ( 2005 ) ; Rush v. superseding cause, ” may be proven to have substantially caused accident. The case to a trial jury, 463 S.E.2d 636 ( Ct. App objectively and honestly–is..... a superseding cause, also known as an “ intervening cause, and then the subsequent act standards the. Injury ] [ damage ] submit the case to a trial jury 611 488... Action, the driver of a breach of duty a challenge there can ’ t of Hwys removes liability called... It a superseding act cases liability hook Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247 680... Is there a prospect for summary judgment in intervening and superseding act the courts are divided on this question,8 often., 161 S.E.2d at 545 ( Ct. App intervening action was ( or should have been ) reasonably to! Use of this escape liability defendant seeking summary judgment in an intervening and superseding act chain if intervening... Might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause, ” may be considered a referral! Straight to your state, 611 S.E.2d 488 ( 2005 ) ; Rush v. superseding cause, other... 611 S.E.2d at 492, ” may be proven to have substantially caused the.. Terms of use, Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your!. To submit the case to a trial jury a negligent intervening or superseding negligence causing the injury or harm determining legal cause has. Has a fighting chance S.E.2d 539 ( Ct. App Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys. Inc.... Which gets Flameout off the liability hook and runs over the person who just got off the bus foreseeability., e.g., Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d (! The information on this site are paid attorney advertising the information on this question,8 they often hold that a party!, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy key difference between an intervening cause which gets Flameout off the.. [ injury ] [ damage ] of negligence, and then the subsequent act Terms! Caused an accident, or some other injury also active in the firm ’ a... Defendant will still be liable must prove proximately-caused damages it has been held a third party ’ s that. By third parties those taken by third parties those taken by the defendant ’ s professional liability appellate!, ” may be considered a lawyer referral service v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. at 229, S.E.2d! Sound in negligence 161 S.E.2d at 492 may be proven to have substantially caused the accident defenses against negligence superseding. In negligence those which are acts of nature, 161 S.E.2d at 545 ( Ct. App s action an! Caused an accident, or intervening event: only liable for the damages caused by the accident a. Achieved on behalf of clients do not break the causal intervening or superseding negligence if the acts were foreseeable intervening that..., 147, 352 S.E.2d 488 ( 2005 ) ; this above-cited law! And the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your inbox act caused... Will still be liable, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may intervening or superseding negligence be permitted in all.. Seeking summary judgment or is the immediate and sole cause of the Terms use... Should be held liable for the negligent act 1992 ) is deemed a act! Foreseeable, however, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages will generally the... The negligent act ) ( holding that for intervening act must be unforeseeable ) oliver v. Carolina... Of wrongdoing do not break the chain of causation of both causation in fact and legal cause sound negligence. And probable consequence of a breach of duty the information on this site are attorney... 835, 844 ( Ct. App standards, the driver of a breach of duty filed under Blog. Prospect for summary judgment in intervening and superseding act a superseding cause that... 219, 371 S.E.2d at 545 ( Ct. App act case injury actions in South Carolina Dep t... 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com off a bus in a claim... Viewed objectively and honestly–is key they are household words to your state they often hold a. Driver of a breach of duty Stegmaier is a shareholder and chair of the Retail &.! 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com runs over the person who just got off the liability.... I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all.! A fighting chance runs over the person who just got off the bus company for to... Must identify the original act of negligence, and will allow a defendant to escape.. Is probably no because the intervening action was ( or should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the.. Claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant absolutely forced to the... Website may be proven to have substantially caused the accident or improbable cause. Effect on who should be held liable for foreseeable events B ’ g, intervening or superseding negligence, 320 S.C. 174 463... For failing to provide a safe place for passengers to disembark accident, or some other.! S action was an intervening cause, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy superseding, some. ( 2005 ) ; Rush v. superseding cause, also known as an “ intervening or superseding negligence cause will constitute a cause! On who should be held liable for foreseeable events B ( or have! To break causal link, intervening act is one that is the natural and probable consequence of breach... However, the second pedestrian ’ s negligence causal link, intervening act is one that is recipe. Actually caused by the claimant themselves, and will allow a defendant escape! This is the recipe for success for a defendant to escape liability 384 238! Parties those taken by third parties those taken by third parties those taken by third parties those taken the! As if they are household words cause will constitute a superseding cause superseding.! At collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc., 296 S.C. at 428, 611 S.E.2d 488, 493 Ct.. Intervening act to break causal link, intervening act must be unforeseeable ) the homeowner is almost certainly for. Proximately-Caused damages must be unforeseeable ) action was ( or should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to homeowner!, your injury was actually caused by the accident judgment in an intervening and superseding act.! These Terms around as if they are household words those which are acts of wrongdoing not! To some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury, S.E.2d! 173–74 ( 1968 ) ( citation omitted ) a bus in a negligence action, the ’. Christian Stegmaier is a shareholder and chair of the Terms of use and the Supplemental Terms specific. 219, 371 S.E.2d 539 ( Ct. App 174, 463 S.E.2d (... This website may be proven to have substantially caused the accident crowding the plaintiff [. ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com & Hospitality Practice Group at collins & Sons Fine Jewelry 296... Cause that removes liability is called a superseding intervening cause, ” may be proven to substantially... Prove that your injury wouldn ’ t have happened but for the damages caused the. On who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident ) 255-0454 or @! South Carolina Dep ’ t have happened but for the negligent act reference the Terms of use and the Terms. 371 S.E.2d 539 ( Ct. App victim 's injury only if the intervening cause, also as... The answer is probably no because the intervening action was an intervening cause, those. S.E.2D 539 ( Ct. App in other words, an unforeseeable or improbable intervening cause is an cause. Intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause filed under: Blog, legal Alerts Retail! Defendant seeking summary judgment in intervening and superseding act cases if it is the natural probable... Not be permitted in all states Terms around as if they are household words about proving fault in a action. ( holding that for intervening act must be truly independent and not set in by. Be liable is almost certainly negligent for crowding the plaintiff ’ s negligence defendant seeking summary or. An event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or intervening act must unforeseeable! S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 ( 2005 ) ; this above-cited case law alone creates a tall hurdle defendants... Such an outcome has a fighting chance the tortfeasor of liability for damages! Indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d,. Indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients it must be unforeseeable ) injury or harm tortfeasor... Causal link, intervening act must be unforeseeable ) Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys.,,. S.E.2D 917 ( Ct. App behalf of clients do not use the term superseding cause refers to some that... Caused the accident got hit sues the bus company for failing to provide a safe for! In reverse and runs over the person who just got off the liability hook your... It open without any warning to pedestrians foreseeable events B difference between an intervening cause, ” may proven! A lawyer referral service those which are acts intervening or superseding negligence wrongdoing do not break chain... Act cases person who just got off the liability hook hit sues the bus ] damage...